Re: 2.5 development
From: Tom Rini <hidden>
Date: 2002-02-15 18:50:16
On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 10:44:33AM -0800, Larry McVoy wrote:
quoted
These are related trees. For 2.5.x all of the PPC trees are related to the official Linus 2.5.x bk tree. Something like: linux-2.5 -> {for-linus-*, linuxppc-2.5}. Since linuxppc-2.5 and for-linus-ppc are both children of linux-2.5, shouldn't they be related?Yes, if they are all clones from the same original tree, they are all related. The way to tell is to run "bk identity" in each tree, if that output is the same, you may pull between them. I thought Paul was talking about taking changes from the tree Cort created and putting it the tree Linus created.
Nope. We're still using those for 2.2 and 2.4, but the official tree for 2.5 (since it makes our lives easier too :)) So are out of order changesets on the horizon? -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/