These are related trees. For 2.5.x all of the PPC trees are related to
the official Linus 2.5.x bk tree. Something like:
linux-2.5 -> {for-linus-*, linuxppc-2.5}.
Since linuxppc-2.5 and for-linus-ppc are both children of linux-2.5,
shouldn't they be related?
Yes, if they are all clones from the same original tree, they are all
related. The way to tell is to run "bk identity" in each tree, if that
output is the same, you may pull between them.
I thought Paul was talking about taking changes from the tree Cort created
and putting it the tree Linus created.
--
---
Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 10:44:33AM -0800, Larry McVoy wrote:
quoted
These are related trees. For 2.5.x all of the PPC trees are related to
the official Linus 2.5.x bk tree. Something like:
linux-2.5 -> {for-linus-*, linuxppc-2.5}.
Since linuxppc-2.5 and for-linus-ppc are both children of linux-2.5,
shouldn't they be related?
Yes, if they are all clones from the same original tree, they are all
related. The way to tell is to run "bk identity" in each tree, if that
output is the same, you may pull between them.
I thought Paul was talking about taking changes from the tree Cort created
and putting it the tree Linus created.
Nope. We're still using those for 2.2 and 2.4, but the official tree
for 2.5 (since it makes our lives easier too :))
So are out of order changesets on the horizon?
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/