Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2001-09-26

Re: Adding 'bus_offset' to pci_controller

From: Matt Porter <hidden>
Date: 2001-09-26 21:54:30

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

On Thu, Sep 27, 2001 at 10:59:32AM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
Mark A. Greer writes:
quoted
Wait, I can't b/c then *everyone* will have this subtraction happen and
everyone but me would be broken.
With a separate field, I don't mess up other  board ports.
Well, how many other boards are there out there that use
indirect_pci.c and have more than one host bridge?  Anyone?
The CPC710 ports, K2 and Adirondack.  Soon to be a large number of
boards with GT64620 since it seems to be the high-end system
controller of choice for embedded 7xx/74xx these days and
everybody wants Linux.
quoted
Another way to go would be to #ifdef your suggestion into indirect_pci.c
for my board only.
Which do you prefer?
Not the ifdef. :)  Either make your own version of the indirect_pci
routines or add the field.
New field seems better than dupping 98% of indirect_pci, IMHO.

--
Matt Porter
MontaVista Software, Inc.
mporter@mvista.com

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help