Re: patch for mktree.c on cross compiles
From: Mark Hatle <hidden>
Date: 2001-09-06 22:02:20
andrew may wrote:
quoted
Yes, it's an imperfect solution at best. What would be correct is for us to copy all of the needed magic into our own header and toss it in arch/ppc/boot/include. With some proper magic for the !Linux case too.I am not sure why we would need to do this. mktree.c already includes libc headers and the htonl defination is pulled in with them. This does increase our build requirments to have a working libc env on the host. To be completely correct not only will you need to have the byte order magic in arch/ppc/boot/include, but also all the file access magic as well, since mktree reads in a file, adds a header and then writes out another file.
I have a concern that using any glibc (specific) stuff will break cross compiling from say a solaris system to linux. I thing Andrew is right, the correct solution is probably to copy the bits into the boot/include dir. --Mark ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/