Re: 4xx - a question and a patch
From: Dan Malek <hidden>
Date: 2001-09-05 04:18:30
David Gibson wrote:
The 405gp manual implies that an mtspr to the PIT writes both the decrementing value and the reload register. Is this a hardware / documentation bug?
Well, the point is that it writes the reload register. When it gets to zero, it reloads with this register, which is wrong.
..... Could the PIT be used this way if auto-reload was disabled?
No, because the PIT doesn't count down past zero. If they would have allowed this, we could have disabled the auto-reload and treated it just like the decrementer. The best I could come up with is just allow the PIT run with a proper and fixed reload value. It isn't a decrementer and we can't treat it like one.
Sure, but it's still useful to be able to run binaries copied from "normal" PPC machines.
Just remember that you can't be mixing float emulation and in-line floating point software. -- Dan ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/