Re: dcache BUG()
From: Dan Malek <hidden>
Date: 2001-05-08 20:27:26
From: Dan Malek <hidden>
Date: 2001-05-08 20:27:26
David Blythe wrote:
.... However, we can only make it happen on our 405GP walnut board(s) and not our prototype 405GP board(s) (they both have rev D processors).
Oh, great :-).....Are there any obvious differences, like clock speed, memory type or configuration, etc.? If someone gets a chance, would you give the FSM labs linuxppc_2_5 sources a whirl before they disappear? I don't expect it to be perfect, but it would sure be nice debugging something else for a change :-). I modified the Ethernet driver cache stuff at least..... Thanks. -- Dan ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/