Re: Rsync access through NAT?
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date: 2001-04-24 19:12:43
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2001-04-25 · Re: Rsync access through NAT? · Peter Cordes <hidden>
- 2001-04-24 · Re: Rsync access through NAT? · Michel Dänzer <hidden>
- 2001-04-24 · Re: Rsync access through NAT? · Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
- 2001-04-24 · Re: Rsync access through NAT? · Ethan Benson <hidden>
On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, jeramy b smith wrote:
I'm not sure. The routers are cisco 55xx and 75xx with the latest firmware loaded. From there it hits the SprintLink and Abovenet clouds. I wish there was a tool that could do an point to point traceroute like journey and stop when it hits a hop that doesn't support ECN. Or does traceroute do this when used with 2.4 and ECN support on?
I think it does.
-jeramy b smith mlan@cpu.lu wrote:quoted
Yup, that seems to be the problem. rsync works again for me on penguinppc. So I guess that some device close to penguinppc.org doesn't support ECN.....
Then why can I ping penguinppc.org without problems? Because my AXP firewall
still runs 2.2.x?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/