Re: xine, ppc and illegal instructions

On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Henry Worth wrote:

Bill Fink wrote:

quoted

A theory why xine 0.4.01 would work on Henry's system but not on mine
was that Henry was running with a newer glibc (2.2.something).  I was

Actually, I'm at 2.1.3 and 2.95.3 compiler, but the common
denominator for those failing seems to be Debian distributions,
whereas I'm LPPC Q4.

OK, maybe it's the compiler.  I'm running YDL 1.2.1 with:

gwiz% rpm -q -a | egrep 'gcc|glibc'
gcc-2.95.2-1i
gcc-c++-2.95.2-1i
gcc-objc-2.95.2-1i
gcc-g77-2.95.2-1i
glibc-2.1.3-15f
glibc-devel-2.1.3-15f

You're running gcc-2.95.3 while I'm running gcc-2.95.2-1i.

Well so much for that theory.  I just upgraded to gcc-2.95.3-2n from
LPPC 2000 Q4 and it didn't help.

How about shared libraries?  Here's the list of packages from my
system that provide shared libraries for xine (from ldd):

	glibc-2.1.3-15f
	XFree86-libs-4.0.2-2a
	imlib-1.9.8-1
	libjpeg-devel-6b-10
	libtiff-devel-3.5.4-5
	libungif-4.1.0-3
	libpng-devel-1.0.5-3
	zlib-1.1.3-6
	esound-0.2.20-0
	audiofile-0.1.9-3

Henry, could you please let me know what versions of the above you
are running on your system so I can compare?

I have a suspicion it might be an X problem although I can't say why
I feel that way.  I'm running using Xv on an ATY Rage128.

						-Thanks

						-Bill


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/