Re: status of ppc support in official 2.4.0 or Alan's 2.4.0-ac1
From: Tom Rini <hidden>
Date: 2001-01-08 17:03:07
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 05:54:00PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Tom Rini wrote:quoted
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 04:16:24PM +0000, Iain Sandoe wrote:quoted
(for those of us who still haven't had time to tangle with bk ;-) and can I expect it to build? what state does it represent? (i.e. is it a continuation of the same tree - or a rebuild from the 2.4.0 final)The 2_4 tree is building. If it's not building, report it here. It represents what will someday get to Linus. Hopefully sooner rather than later. It's a new tree which is the old tree. Cort made a new one, called 2_4 and I put all of our changes from 2_3 back in. It's based off of 2.4.0 final.quoted
is there any point trying kernel.org 2.4.0 final? (or ac3 - which I pulled last night)It may help to create nightly diffs between Linus' 2.4.0 and linuxppc_2_4 and put them on some FTP site. People still more like patches than bk :-)
Doesn't sound like a bad idea. :) -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/