Re: Changes in the Valkyrie driver from 2.1.24 to 2.2.18
From: Chris Boot <hidden>
Date: 2001-01-04 10:26:06
Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:quoted
On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Chris Boot wrote:quoted
It has struck me, after weeks of research, that my problems in booting my 5400/180 cold through OpenFirmware are caused by changes in the LinuxChris, are you trying to boot with Quik? This, in fact, stopped working on the 5400/6400 around kernel 2.1.125, IIRC. What's wrong with using BootX?
Well, I was hoping not to have any Mac OS on this machine except a full-blown Mac OS 9 when needed. This would allow me to Quik-boot Linux and set OF to use /AAPL,ROM when needed through my serial console. I don't believe I can choose between booting Linux/Mac OS in any other system using a serial console (only built-in monitor).
quoted
quoted
My suspicions were aroused when, after disabling CONFIG_FB, the machine booted cold without any problems whatsoever.And what display?
Well, I usually use the built-in one, but when I disabled CONFIG_FB, I didn't use a display, I just used my serial console / telnet.
quoted
quoted
Is it at all possible to use Valkyrie without going through OpenFirmware at all? It is not selectable if I disable CONFIG_FB_OF. Would it be possible to port the older non-OF driver to the newer kernel? What are the disadvantages of using the older memory-based driver to the newer OF-based driver?Have you tried 2.4.0-testX yet? In 2.4.0-testX, valkyriefb is initialized without the help of offb. I don't have a 2.2.18 tree at hand, but you can probably use a similar method in 2.2.18 with some hacking (call valkyriefb_init() from drivers/video/fbmem.c, and not offb_init()).Geert, this modification is contained in the 2.2.18 kernels from bk and from Paul. It just didn't make it into the official 2.2.18 tree. But most users of valkyrie probably don't care anyway.
I haven't tried the 2.4 tree because I didn't know how reliable it was. I
guess it's time to try it now. How/where do I get it?
You say that these changes didn't make it into the kernel.org tree, but
where do I get the BK images? Is there a way of getting it through
FTP/HTTP?
Thanks,
--
.-. Chris Boot
/v\ bootc@worldnet.fr
// \\
/( )\ L I N U X
^^-^^ >Phear the Penguin<
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/