Re: Is the difference in IRQ maps between 2.4/2.2 intentional?
From: Matt Porter <hidden>
Date: 2000-10-24 20:38:56
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 09:15:44AM -0700, Vitaly Luban wrote:
Hi folks ! Maybe anybody will enlighten me, is the difference between IRQ maps initialization (arch/ppc/kernel/prep_pci.c) in 2.4 and 2.2 intentional or not? The difference is in that for Mesquite_pci_IRQ_map, Sitka_pci_IRQ_map, MTX_pci_IRQ_map, MTXplus_pci_IRQ_map and Genesis2_pci_IRQ_map some fields have been initialised for 2.2.16 and zero for 2.4.
Look at all of prep_pci.c and you'll see that many board specific PCI changes were made in the linuxppc_2_2 tree that have not yet been merged up to linuxppc_2_3. It is in the plan, however. The map changes are benign cruft from a set of changes I merged in a long time ago. It was a hack to place 0x1e value at the PIB's IDSEL for some IDE fixups that aren't really necessary. Now you know the whole story. :) -- Matt Porter MontaVista Software, Inc. mporter@mvista.com ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/