Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2000-10-24

Re: Is the difference in IRQ maps between 2.4/2.2 intentional?

From: Matt Porter <hidden>
Date: 2000-10-24 20:38:56

On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 09:15:44AM -0700, Vitaly Luban wrote:
Hi folks !

Maybe anybody will enlighten me, is the difference between
IRQ maps initialization (arch/ppc/kernel/prep_pci.c) in 2.4
and 2.2 intentional or not? The difference is in that for

Mesquite_pci_IRQ_map,
Sitka_pci_IRQ_map,
MTX_pci_IRQ_map,
MTXplus_pci_IRQ_map and
Genesis2_pci_IRQ_map

some fields have been initialised for 2.2.16 and zero for 2.4.
Look at all of prep_pci.c and you'll see that many board specific
PCI changes were made in the linuxppc_2_2 tree that have not
yet been merged up to linuxppc_2_3.  It is in the plan, however.

The map changes are benign cruft from a set of changes I merged
in a long time ago.  It was a hack to place 0x1e value at the
PIB's IDSEL for some IDE fixups that aren't really necessary.

Now you know the whole story. :)

--
Matt Porter
MontaVista Software, Inc.
mporter@mvista.com

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help