Frank Rowand writes:
Paul Mackerras wrote:
[snip]
quoted
Because we'll make it the same value for all ports. Anybody got any
objections to 0xff000000?
Yes. It is equivalently mapped on the PPC 405 at 0xe8000000.
But that's a physical address, not necessarily a virtual address,
right? I was talking about virtual address 0xff000000. Any
particular reason why you have to have virtual == physical? (If there
is, my response will probably be "fix it". :-)
Paul.
--
Paul Mackerras, Senior Open Source Researcher, Linuxcare, Inc.
+61 2 6262 8990 tel, +61 2 6262 8991 fax
paulus@linuxcare.com.au, http://www.linuxcare.com.au/
Linuxcare. Support for the revolution.
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/