Re: [patch] VRAM detection in controlfb
From: Michel Lanners <hidden>
Date: 2000-06-04 13:55:59
Hi all, On 3 Jun, this message from Ani Joshi echoed through cyberspace:
quoted
For those with multiple display adapters, do you think an option controlfb:off might make sense?
Silly me; that's already taken care of in fbmem.c.
quoted
As there is no way to control which card gets assigned which framebuffer device, that might help in certain situations...I believe you can set which driver gets init'ed first by using the args: video=foo:blah video=bar:blah
Right, that's handles in fbmem.c. Unfortunately, I've never seen it documented anywhere... So, I've started to write up a doc about framebuffer kernel command line options. I've come across a few oddities; among others the format of options: 1. What do the vc: and map: options do? 2. Why can you specify more options after 'scrollback:', separated with a ',', but not after the 'map:' option (no other options possible), whereas you can have more options following 'vc:', but without a separator? Thanks Michel BTW, anybody have the fbutils compiled for 2k and recent kernels? I can't seem to get it to compile.... ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Michel Lanners | " Read Philosophy. Study Art. 23, Rue Paul Henkes | Ask Questions. Make Mistakes. L-1710 Luxembourg | email mlan@cpu.lu | http://www.cpu.lu/~mlan | Learn Always. " ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/