Re: Low Memory / Software Emulation Exception / Performance
From: Marcus Sundberg <hidden>
Date: 2000-04-11 16:40:46
"Wohlgemuth, Jason" [off-list ref] writes:
Just a few more questions. After applying the head.S patch our software emulation exceptions have gone away, although, I intend to go back and trip the exception with a logic analyzer attached to verify everything with our hardware engineer. However, this patch seems to induce ultra-slow performance in areas where we map physical memory down to the user-level with /dev/mem, my guess is that it has something to do with this:
Tring to map in RAM via /dev/mem is equivalent to mapping /dev/zero - you'll get anonymous private pages (which are cached). Don't ask me why it is done like that... Trying to map in memory above RAM via /dev/mem will work as intended, and will always give you caching inhibited pages. The dirty page fix should not alter this behaviour afaikt. Which is it that you are doing?
Specifically, the part regarding _PAGE_WRITETHRU being redefined to _PAGE_NO_CACHE, is this a correct assumption?
Yes, but _PAGE_WRITETHRU is not used by anything in the standard kernel so it shouldn't make any difference.
Is anyone else running into performance related issues with this patch applied?
I haven't noted anything like that, but on the other hand we have no apps mapping /dev/mem. //Marcus -- Signature under construction, please come back later. ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/