Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2000-04-13

Re: Problems with Ethernet on PowerBook Wallstreet G3

From: Wolfgang Denk <hidden>
Date: 2000-04-13 09:39:05

In message [off-list ref] you wrote:
That might be a result of the interface init - if there are no real
collisions otherwise. What number of collisions does the other machine
log?
Seems normal to me for a usually lightly loaded network; for instance:

          RX packets:15315134 errors:1699 dropped:210 overruns:1691 frame:16
          TX packets:1427615 errors:7 dropped:0 overruns:3 carrier:4
          collisions:27791 txqueuelen:100

          RX packets:11453931 errors:10 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:20
          TX packets:5286558 errors:3 dropped:0 overruns:2 carrier:1
          collisions:1157 txqueuelen:100

          RX packets:2011658 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:1477258 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:8579 txqueuelen:100
This, together with your info that the missing bytes happen on packet
boundaries, strongly supports BenH's idea that we may be running into the
txdma bug quoted above. The chipset apparently needs to be tweaked some
way to reset the transmitter before starting the next DMA frame.
Yepp.
What machine is on the receiving end? The file size being conserved may be
The other machines are either PC's running Linux (2.2.12 on a AMD-K6,
2.2.13 on a dual P-II, 2.3.51 on a dual P-III)  or  embedded  systems
(2.2.13 on MPX8xx, with xx=23, 50 and 60).
due to Linux only looking at the packet size from the header (not cross
checking with the size actually received), the sending machine padding the
packet, or the BMAC on the receiving end placing packet size and status at
the end of the frame.

No idea why the bug correlates with disk activity - is the disk interrupt
priority higher than ethernet DMA?
Well, I have no absolute evidence that there is a strict correlation.
It's more a certain feeling, and the observation that usually a  'tar
-zcf  - . | rsh ..." is almost certain to fail, while a plain FTP has
at least a 50...70% chance to be ok.

Regarding the interrupts:

# cat /proc/interrupts
           CPU0
  4:          0   PMAC-PIC      SCC-txdma
  5:          0   PMAC-PIC      SCC-rxdma
  6:          0   PMAC-PIC      SCC-txdma
  7:          0   PMAC-PIC      SCC-rxdma
  8:          1   PMAC-PIC      AWACS out
 12:         15   PMAC-PIC      MESH
 13:      20987   PMAC-PIC      ide0
 14:          5   PMAC-PIC      ide1
 15:          0   PMAC-PIC      SCC
 16:          0   PMAC-PIC      SCC
 17:          0   PMAC-PIC      AWACS
 18:       6587   PMAC-PIC      VIA-PMU
 19:          0   PMAC-PIC      SWIM3
 27:          1   PMAC-PIC      interrupt cascade
 32:      92922   PMAC-PIC      BMAC-txdma
 33:      70818   PMAC-PIC      BMAC-rxdma
 42:     163755   PMAC-PIC      BMAC-misc
 68:          0   PMAC-PI2      SCC-txdma
 69:          0   PMAC-PI2      SCC-rxdma
 79:          0   PMAC-PI2      SCC
 83:          0   PMAC-PI2      SWIM3

Hm... I have no idea if this relates to interrupt priorities on  this
box.

Also, after a failing FTP transfer:

# cat /proc/net/bmac
BMAC counters & registers
MEMADD: 0x000000
MEMDATAHI: 0x000000
MEMDATALO: 0x000000
TXPNTR: 0x000214
RXPNTR: 0x0002ce
IPG1: 0x000008
IPG2: 0x000004
ALIMIT: 0x000010
SLOT: 0x000040
PALEN: 0x000007
PAPAT: 0x0000aa
TXSFD: 0x0000ab
JAM: 0x000004
TXCFG: 0x000001
TXMAX: 0x0005ee
TXMIN: 0x000040
PAREG: 0x00000b
DCNT: 0x00b861
NCCNT: 0x0092cf
NTCNT: 0x003635
EXCNT: 0x000000
LTCNT: 0x000000
TXSM: 0x000010
RXCFG: 0x000b01
RXMAX: 0x0005ee
RXMIN: 0x000040
FRCNT: 0x0014d2
AECNT: 0x000000
FECNT: 0x000000
RXSM: 0x000002
RXCV: 0x000000

# ifconfig eth0
eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:05:02:07:39:97
          inet addr:10.0.0.3  Bcast:10.255.255.255  Mask:255.0.0.0
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:70896 errors:1 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:92979 errors:2 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0


Wolfgang Denk

--
Software Engineering:  Embedded and Realtime Systems,  Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87  Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88  Email: wd@denx.de
"It is better to have tried and failed than to have  failed  to  try,
but the result's the same."                           - Mike Dennison

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help