Thread (5 messages) flat view 5 messages, 3 authors, 2000-03-11

Re: patch to get latest XFree 4.0 snapshot (xf3918) to work on pp cwith r128

From: David A. Gatwood <hidden>
Date: 2000-03-09 16:31:10

On Tue, 6 Jun 2000, Kevin B. Hendricks wrote:
quoted
quoted
3. 601 processors may barf(?) on some of these instructions.
No, it does not. It's just that the cache is unified which makes most
coherency functions irrelevant.
So 601's have no problems with sync and isync, just eieio?  AFAIK, there is
some code snippet in the kernel that somehow works around a 601 problem
with one of the synchronization instructions but I don't remember which one
right off hand.
There's a bug on certain cards in x100-land that makes them crash on
sync() and eieio().  isync() is irrelevant on a 601, since there's not a
separate instruction cache.

I can only assume that this is what the original poster meant.


Later,
David


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help