Re:my web page
From: Alain RICHARD <hidden>
Date: 2000-02-15 11:13:14
I have done a little web page describing the current state of kernel development for the powermac and how to get my rsync trees. It's at http://linuxcare.com.au/paulus/kernels.html. Let me know if there is anything I should explain better (or more). :-) -- Paul Mackerras, Senior Open Source Researcher, Linuxcare, Inc. +61 2 6262 8990 tel, +61 2 6262 8991 fax paulus@linuxcare.com.au, http://www.linuxcare.com.au/ Linuxcare. Support for the revolution.
This is a very helpfull page. It was needed since a lot of time. Just somes remarks : I think we need an "official" stable pmac/ppc version. It is not always clear if the main kernel release version is good for us (and in many cases it proved to be good for old hardware), or what is the current mostly recommended official version for ppc architecture (for example the last one really distributed . This version may be distributed as just a diff file from the official ftp.kernel.org stable version and a comment to what hardware is or is not supported. I am bored to see a lot of binary stable kernels distributed without corresponding sources, so please always let us recompile our own kernel with our own set of options. My second remark is that it is very difficult for us to know to whom patches must be submited. In the past I have used several options : - submit a patch to the author or maintener of the source I patch. Not always possible because somes patches will impact several sources maintained by several different people. This was shown as the most efficient option when avail. - submit patch to the main kernel list or main kernel mainteners. Not always efficient because some patches that are not specific to the pmac architecture are difficult to explain to the i386 centric main kernel (for example edianess problems or hardware architecture peculiarities). - submit patch to the pmac or ppc kernel maintener (paulus and cort). It is a problem for me to see theses tree kernels separated (pmac,ppc and kernel.org) and sometime there are problems in synchronizing them. For example I have seen some patches included in one of theses kernels and lost in synchronisation. Or I have got some patch that where never included and the kernel list plagged with complains about exactly the same problem I was have submit a patch month ago. So please, setup a page (for example on linuxppc.org or www.ppc.kernel.org) to indicates to us, potential kernel supporters, the simplest way of supporting ppc kernels. Regards, ------------------------------------------------------- Alain RICHARD <mailto:alain.richard@equation.fr> EQUATION SA <http://www.equation.fr/> Tel : +33 477 79 48 00 Fax : +33 477 79 48 01 Applications client/serveur, ingénierie réseau et Linux ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/