Re: Updated Mozilla M13 Release Build Available

Kevin Puetz wrote:
Before I answer thes, are there any people with positive reports? I
need to
hear from you if it installed perfectly as well as if you had
problems. Please
be sure you include me directly in the replies to this message. I'm
cc'ing the
list in case anyone else is interested in simplebrowser.

I have your original post of mozilla 13 (after getting the new
libstdc++ and even the wierd libelf symlink fix..) There are some
bugs, but it's working fine otherwise..

--Nelson Abramson

OK people, please cut it out with the libelf hack :-). I statically linked
that one lib in (that's what the update last night was), as LinuxPPC appears
to not have it. I need to know that the updated version posted to
<http://www.public.iastate.edu/~puetzk> late last night now works on a vanilla
LinuxPPC system (+libstdc++-2.10) without any other messing around. Can anyone
give me a yes/no?


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Kevin Puetz wrote:

OK people, please cut it out with the libelf hack :-). I statically linked
that one lib in (that's what the update last night was), as LinuxPPC appears
to not have it. I need to know that the updated version posted to
<http://www.public.iastate.edu/~puetzk> late last night now works on a vanilla
LinuxPPC system (+libstdc++-2.10) without any other messing around. Can anyone
give me a yes/no?

Yes.

Well, I don't know about vanilla since I am always messing around, but I
didn't have to do anything to make this run. Just tar zxf and then
mozilla. As others found, it is almost usable.

--
Martin

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Kevin Puetz wrote:

OK people, please cut it out with the libelf hack :-). I statically linked
that one lib in (that's what the update last night was), as LinuxPPC appears
to not have it. I need to know that the updated version posted to
<http://www.public.iastate.edu/~puetzk> late last night now works on a vanilla
LinuxPPC system (+libstdc++-2.10) without any other messing around. Can anyone
give me a yes/no?

Okay, after your whining about the libelf.so library ;-) I redownloaded the new
version and it seems to work atleast as well as the other one.  It starts and
runs anways.

HTH
--Nelson Abramson


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/