Franz Sirl wrote:
quoted
Is this a known (and hopefully already fixed ;-) bug, or should it go
directly to gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org?
I believe this is fixed in my current gcc-2.95.2 RPM-set available on
<ftp://devel.linuxppc.org/users/fsirl/>.
It is fixed, thanks a lot!
Yours, Albrecht.
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/