Re: still no accelerated X ($#!$*)
From: Kevin Hendricks <hidden>
Date: 2000-01-20 18:25:40
Hi, Thanks for your reply.
Why does each application/library define its own, incorrect definition of byte-reversed instructions? Doesn't some Linux/PPC header file define this once in a awy that could be imported by others?
I could not find one. I will look again.
One cannot use "r" as a constraint for a base address, that is what the GCC PowerPC port defines "b" for. The load/store instruction patterns in the GCC PowerPC machine description file use a different constraint letter for the base address, and anyone writing inlined assembly -- especially loads and stores -- should browse the GCC machine description.
Thanks I will as soon as I find it ;-). But the assembler generated was exactly the same in my simple test case. Is this just luck? Thanks, Kevin ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/