Re: FEC ERROR 41200000 on CLLF-860T
From: Graham Stoney <hidden>
Date: 1999-12-12 23:56:04
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 1999-12-15 · Re: FEC ERROR 41200000 on CLLF-860T · Marcus Sundberg <hidden>
- 1999-12-09 · Re: FEC ERROR 41200000 on CLLF-860T · Dan Malek <hidden>
- 1999-12-09 · Re: FEC ERROR 41200000 on CLLF-860T · Marcus Sundberg <hidden>
- 1999-12-09 · Re: FEC ERROR 41200000 on CLLF-860T · Graham Stoney <hidden>
- 1999-12-07 · Re: FEC ERROR 41200000 on CLLF-860T · Dan Malek <hidden>
Marcus Sundberg writes:
No, Graham was expecting/hoping for 8 M _bytes_, not bits. So in fact it's actual performance is about 1/3 of that, which I pointed out to him.
Marcus is right; we'd like to use all the bandwidth available on the FEC for optimal system performance. Can anyone elaborate or provide pointers to more information on the FEC throughput issue? Is there really a hardware problem in the CPU, or is it a board specific issue? Thanks, Graham ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/