Thread (3 messages) 3 messages, 3 authors, 1999-11-23

Re: bootloader & head.S weirdness (patch)

From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date: 1999-11-23 20:16:38

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

On Tue, 23 Nov 1999, Cort Dougan wrote:
Do you keep the list around after the initialization?  We do something
similar with the prep residual data but after we grab what we want we free
the RAM.  

} The idea is to pass the bootinfo not as a fixed (inherently back/forewards
} incompatible) struct, but as a concatenation of records. Each record contains
} a tag ID, a size, and data:
} 
} struct bi_record {
}     unsigned short tag;                 /* tag ID */
}     unsigned short size;                /* size of record (in bytes) */
}     unsigned long data[0];              /* data */
} };
No we don't. The structure isn't that large, and the kernel is padded to a multiple
of the page size anyway (the structure is after the kernel in memory).

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
P.S. How much Belgian Beer do I have to send you to convince you to put your
     comments _below_ the text you quote, like all other people do? ;-)
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- Linux/{m68k~Amiga,PPC~CHRP} -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
							    -- Linus Torvalds


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help