Thread (2 messages) 2 messages, 2 authors, 1999-09-28

Re: 2.2.13 build OOB?; need for some standardization here?

From: Geert Uytterhoeven <hidden>
Date: 1999-09-28 16:48:37

On Tue, 28 Sep 1999, Sriranga Veeraraghavan wrote:
I see this is happening already. For example, most commercial products
for Linux are RH 5.0 or newer. I think that the closer the LinuxPPC
distributions come to RH for x86 the easier it will be to attract
commercial software. In the transition from LinuxPPC R4 to LinuxPPC
R5, I think that the linuxppc.com guys did a pretty good job.
Note that LinuxPPC is not identical to RH 5.0 on ia32.

If you want a distro that's the most identical on al architectures (and
supports the most architectures), then you have to go for Debian. There's no
other distro that runs on all my boxes (m68k, AXP and PPC).

Greetings,

						Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven ----------------- Sony Suprastructure Center Europe (SUPC-E)
Geert.Uytterhoeven@sonycom.com ------------------- Sint Stevens Woluwestraat 55
Phone +32-2-7248648 Fax +32-2-7262686 ---------------- B-1130 Brussels, Belgium


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help