Re: [ppc-dev] Re: Restructuring Efforts
From: David A. Gatwood <hidden>
Date: 1999-02-17 23:44:31
On Wed, 17 Feb 1999, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
I like the function pointers idea but I don't like indexing by machines each time the table is accessed. I beleive we should define a structure of function pointers for each subsystem (setup, mm, irq, ...) at have some boot logic fill the kernel static tables with pointers from the subsystem exported tables. The decision based on the architecure must be done only once.
Sounds a lot like a bunch of things in BSD-like kernels, where, in MkLinux, for instance, interrupt_heathrow.c, interrupt_pdm.c, etc. each have a static structure with pointers to their externally visible functions, and the main function checks the hardware type and assigns a global pointer to point to the static structure for the particular set of routines. Is that what you mean? Later, David David A. Gatwood Visit globegate's internet dgatwood@globegate.utm.edu talker, Deep Space 36 http://globegate.utm.edu telnet globegate.utm.edu:9624 [[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]] [[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]] [[ reply is of general interest. To unsubscribe from linuxppc-dev, send ]] [[ the message 'unsubscribe' to linuxppc-dev-request@lists.linuxppc.org ]]