Thread (12 messages) 12 messages, 6 authors, 1999-01-16

Re: Synchronization [was Re: The Magic Show: kernel_map() disappearing]

From: Alan Cox <hidden>
Date: 1999-01-15 01:38:48

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

That's my rationale for doing the sync and eieio in the mb().  That way,
we're guaranteed no races no matter what assumptions someone makes about
the x86 when adding barriers to their driver code.  Is that unreasonable?
It would be good to get the right stuff done in the drivers not take a
wired in performance hit we cant get back out of

[[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]]
[[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to  Cc linuxppc-dev  if your ]]
[[ reply is of general interest. To unsubscribe from linuxppc-dev, send ]]
[[ the message 'unsubscribe' to linuxppc-dev-request@lists.linuxppc.org ]]
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help