Re: [PATCH 1/2] Remove inode_congested()
From: NeilBrown <hidden>
Date: 2021-12-13 04:59:48
Also in:
linux-ext4, linux-fsdevel, linux-mm, lkml
From: NeilBrown <hidden>
Date: 2021-12-13 04:59:48
Also in:
linux-ext4, linux-fsdevel, linux-mm, lkml
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 03:14:27PM +1100, NeilBrown wrote:quoted
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c index fb9584641ac7..540aa0ea67ff 100644 --- a/mm/vmscan.c +++ b/mm/vmscan.c@@ -989,17 +989,6 @@ static inline int is_page_cache_freeable(struct page *page) return page_count(page) - page_has_private(page) == 1 + page_cache_pins; } -static int may_write_to_inode(struct inode *inode) -{ - if (current->flags & PF_SWAPWRITE) - return 1; - if (!inode_write_congested(inode)) - return 1; - if (inode_to_bdi(inode) == current->backing_dev_info) - return 1; - return 0; -}Why is it safe to get rid of the PF_SWAPWRITE and current->backing_dev_info checks?
Ask George Bool. If inode_write_congested() returns False, then may_write_to_inode() will always return True. NeilBrown
quoted
@@ -1158,8 +1147,6 @@ static pageout_t pageout(struct page *page, struct address_space *mapping) } if (mapping->a_ops->writepage == NULL) return PAGE_ACTIVATE; - if (!may_write_to_inode(mapping->host)) - return PAGE_KEEP; if (clear_page_dirty_for_io(page)) { int res;