Re: [PATCH v7 7/8] fsdax: Introduce dax_iomap_ops for end of reflink
From: Dan Williams <hidden>
Date: 2021-08-27 05:04:33
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, lkml, nvdimm
On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 8:30 PM Shiyang Ruan [off-list ref] wrote:
On 2021/8/20 23:18, Dan Williams wrote:quoted
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 11:13 PM ruansy.fnst [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On 2021/8/20 上午11:01, Dan Williams wrote:quoted
On Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 11:05 PM Shiyang Ruan [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
After writing data, reflink requires end operations to remap those new allocated extents. The current ->iomap_end() ignores the error code returned from ->actor(), so we introduce this dax_iomap_ops and change the dax_iomap_*() interfaces to do this job. - the dax_iomap_ops contains the original struct iomap_ops and fsdax specific ->actor_end(), which is for the end operations of reflink - also introduce dax specific zero_range, truncate_page - create new dax_iomap_ops for ext2 and ext4 Signed-off-by: Shiyang Ruan <redacted> --- fs/dax.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- fs/ext2/ext2.h | 3 ++ fs/ext2/file.c | 6 ++-- fs/ext2/inode.c | 11 +++++-- fs/ext4/ext4.h | 3 ++ fs/ext4/file.c | 6 ++-- fs/ext4/inode.c | 13 ++++++-- fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 3 +- fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c | 3 +- fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 8 ++--- fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++- fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.h | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++ fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c | 7 ++--- fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c | 3 +- include/linux/dax.h | 21 ++++++++++--- include/linux/iomap.h | 1 + 16 files changed, 189 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)diff --git a/fs/dax.c b/fs/dax.c index 74dd918cff1f..0e0536765a7e 100644 --- a/fs/dax.c +++ b/fs/dax.c@@ -1348,11 +1348,30 @@ static loff_t dax_iomap_iter(const struct iomap_iter *iomi, return done ? done : ret; } +static inline int +__dax_iomap_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter, const struct dax_iomap_ops *ops) +{ + int ret; + + /* + * Call dax_iomap_ops->actor_end() before iomap_ops->iomap_end() in + * each iteration. + */ + if (iter->iomap.length && ops->actor_end) { + ret = ops->actor_end(iter->inode, iter->pos, iter->len, + iter->processed); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + } + + return iomap_iter(iter, &ops->iomap_ops);This reorganization looks needlessly noisy. Why not require the iomap_end operation to perform the actor_end work. I.e. why can't xfs_dax_write_iomap_actor_end() just be the passed in iomap_end? I am not seeing where the ->iomap_end() result is ignored?The V6 patch[1] was did in this way. [1]https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20210526005159.GF202144@locust/T/#m79a66a928da2d089e2458c1a97c0516dbfde2f7f (local) But Darrick reminded me that ->iomap_end() will always take zero or positive 'written' because iomap_apply() handles this argument.if (ops->iomap_end) { ret = ops->iomap_end(inode, pos, length, written > 0 ? written : 0, flags, &iomap); }So, we cannot get actual return code from CoW in ->actor(), and as a result, we cannot handle the xfs end_cow correctly in ->iomap_end(). That's where the result of CoW was ignored.Ah, thank you for the explanation. However, this still seems like too much code thrash just to get back to the original value of iter->processed. I notice you are talking about iomap_apply(), but that routine is now gone in Darrick's latest iomap-for-next branch. Instead iomap_iter() does this: if (iter->iomap.length && ops->iomap_end) { ret = ops->iomap_end(iter->inode, iter->pos, iomap_length(iter), iter->processed > 0 ? iter->processed : 0,As you can see, here is the same logic as the old iomap_apply(): the negative iter->processed won't be passed into ->iomap_end().quoted
iter->flags, &iter->iomap); if (ret < 0 && !iter->processed) return ret; } I notice that the @iomap argument to ->iomap_end() is reliably coming from @iter. So you could do the following in your iomap_end() callback: struct iomap_iter *iter = container_of(iomap, typeof(*iter), iomap); struct xfs_inode *ip = XFS_I(inode); ssize_t written = iter->processed;The written will be 0 or positive. The original error code is ingnored.
Correct, but you can use container_of() to get back to the iter and consider the raw untranslated value of iter->processed. As Christoph mentioned this needs a comment explaining the layering violation, but that's a cleaner change than the dax_iomap_ops approach.