On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 01:00:25PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
quoted
+ ASSERT(list_empty(&lip->li_trans) && !bp->b_transp);
Nit: Two separate ASSERTS are generally better than one with two
conditions and a "&&", so that when the assert triggers it shows which
condition caused it.
In this case both checks pretty much mean the same thing so I don't see
much added value, but I don't mind splitting it..
Brian