Thread (19 messages) 19 messages, 3 authors, 2021-04-09

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] xfs: set aside allocation btree blocks from block reservation

From: Brian Foster <hidden>
Date: 2021-03-27 14:52:18

On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 06:34:22PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 11:00:29AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 01:31:53PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 12:17:07PM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
quoted
The blocks used for allocation btrees (bnobt and countbt) are
technically considered free space. This is because as free space is
used, allocbt blocks are removed and naturally become available for
traditional allocation. However, this means that a significant
portion of free space may consist of in-use btree blocks if free
space is severely fragmented.

On large filesystems with large perag reservations, this can lead to
a rare but nasty condition where a significant amount of physical
free space is available, but the majority of actual usable blocks
consist of in-use allocbt blocks. We have a record of a (~12TB, 32
AG) filesystem with multiple AGs in a state with ~2.5GB or so free
blocks tracked across ~300 total allocbt blocks, but effectively at
100% full because the the free space is entirely consumed by
refcountbt perag reservation.

Such a large perag reservation is by design on large filesystems.
The problem is that because the free space is so fragmented, this AG
contributes the 300 or so allocbt blocks to the global counters as
free space. If this pattern repeats across enough AGs, the
filesystem lands in a state where global block reservation can
outrun physical block availability. For example, a streaming
buffered write on the affected filesystem continues to allow delayed
allocation beyond the point where writeback starts to fail due to
physical block allocation failures. The expected behavior is for the
delalloc block reservation to fail gracefully with -ENOSPC before
physical block allocation failure is a possibility.

To address this problem, introduce an in-core counter to track the
sum of all allocbt blocks in use by the filesystem. Use the new
counter to set these blocks aside at reservation time and thus
ensure they cannot be reserved until truly available. Since this is
only necessary when perag reservations are active and the counter
requires a read of each AGF to fully populate, only enforce on perag
res enabled filesystems. This allows initialization of the counter
at ->pagf_init time because the perag reservation init code reads
each AGF at mount time.

Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <redacted>
---
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c       | 12 ++++++++++++
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc_btree.c |  2 ++
 fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c              | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
 fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h              |  6 ++++++
 4 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c
index 0c623d3c1036..9fa378d2724e 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c
@@ -3036,6 +3036,7 @@ xfs_alloc_read_agf(
 	struct xfs_agf		*agf;		/* ag freelist header */
 	struct xfs_perag	*pag;		/* per allocation group data */
 	int			error;
+	uint32_t		allocbt_blks;
 
 	trace_xfs_alloc_read_agf(mp, agno);
 
@@ -3066,6 +3067,17 @@ xfs_alloc_read_agf(
 		pag->pagf_refcount_level = be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_refcount_level);
 		pag->pagf_init = 1;
 		pag->pagf_agflreset = xfs_agfl_needs_reset(mp, agf);
+
+		/*
+		 * Update the global in-core allocbt block counter. Filter
+		 * rmapbt blocks from the on-disk counter because those are
+		 * managed by perag reservation.
+		 */
+		if (pag->pagf_btreeblks > be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_rmap_blocks)) {
+			allocbt_blks = pag->pagf_btreeblks -
+					be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_rmap_blocks);
+			atomic64_add(allocbt_blks, &mp->m_allocbt_blks);
Does growfs call xfs_alloc_read_agf to set pagf_init in the perag
structure when it adds AGs to the filesystem?  I don't /think/ that's
a problem for this use case (since allocbt_blks should be 0 on a freshly
initialized AG) but i was a little surprised to see block reservation
bits here.
I'm not sure it matters who reads AGFs as long as the global counter
remains consistent. For growing an existing AG, it looks like we "free"
the new space into the AG so I think that should be tracked accordingly
like any other alloc/free. For a new AG, it looks like ->agf_btreeblks
starts at 0 and then the perags would likely init through the perag res
call that runs as the final step before the growfs returns.
<nod>
quoted
quoted
The other thing is that online repair (what little of it is in the
kernel currently) can set pagf_init = 0; is that a problem?
Hmm.. if the AGF is corrupt, it seems likely that the in-core counter is
busted as well. We could do something like account the delta from pre
and post repair into the global counter, but I'd be weary of scenarios
where the AGF might have become inconsistent with the counter somehow
How would the allocbt_blks counter become inconsistent with the AGF?  We
update that incore counter at the same time that we update all the other
ondisk and pag counters, so unless the fs is shut down, we know that
m_allocbt_blks is off by the same amount as the inconsistent AGF.
Dunno, bit flip or something? Bug? I'm not going to try and predict how
things might break.
quoted
and the delta itself would throw it off. That might be unlikely, but
what scares me about that is we could actually break the global counter
by attempting to fix it so allocbt blocks become reservable again.
But if you don't even /try/ to fix the counter during an AGF repair,
that almost guarantees that the decisions based on the counter will not
be correct...
It's not clear to me how to fix the counter after a single AGF repair
such that it's more likely to be correct than not. How do we currently
deal with ->m_fdblocks after a repair of a corrupted AGF? It looks to me
that we mark the summary counters sick and expect them to reinit on the
next mount based on the perag values, but I could be missing something
deeper in the scrub code. Is there a more explicit reinit or something
somewhere?
quoted
I'm not sure there's a great answer here. Perhaps the safest thing would
be to warn about an ->agf_btreeblks inconsistency that might result in
some number of "unusable" blocks until a mount cycle occurs and
resynchronizes the global counter..? That also seems to be consistent
with how we handle the superblock counters after an agf repair.
...but OTOH I guess the worst that happens is that we'll ENOSPC early?
Yeah. I think the characteristics of an inconsistent allocbt counter are
either that the set aside is ineffective (i.e. counter too low) or
premature -ENOSPC (counter too high).

Brian
--D
quoted
(All that said, I am somewhat hesitant to add to this unless we
determine the approach is still viable after the expected perag res
changes...).

Brian
quoted
--D
quoted
+		}
 	}
 #ifdef DEBUG
 	else if (!XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(mp)) {
diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc_btree.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc_btree.c
index 8e01231b308e..9f5a45f7baed 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc_btree.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc_btree.c
@@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ xfs_allocbt_alloc_block(
 		return 0;
 	}
 
+	atomic64_inc(&cur->bc_mp->m_allocbt_blks);
 	xfs_extent_busy_reuse(cur->bc_mp, cur->bc_ag.agno, bno, 1, false);
 
 	xfs_trans_agbtree_delta(cur->bc_tp, 1);
@@ -95,6 +96,7 @@ xfs_allocbt_free_block(
 	if (error)
 		return error;
 
+	atomic64_dec(&cur->bc_mp->m_allocbt_blks);
 	xfs_extent_busy_insert(cur->bc_tp, be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_seqno), bno, 1,
 			      XFS_EXTENT_BUSY_SKIP_DISCARD);
 	xfs_trans_agbtree_delta(cur->bc_tp, -1);
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
index 1c97b155a8ee..29f97e909607 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
@@ -1176,6 +1176,7 @@ xfs_mod_fdblocks(
 	int64_t			lcounter;
 	long long		res_used;
 	s32			batch;
+	uint64_t		set_aside;
 
 	if (delta > 0) {
 		/*
@@ -1215,8 +1216,23 @@ xfs_mod_fdblocks(
 	else
 		batch = XFS_FDBLOCKS_BATCH;
 
+	/*
+	 * Set aside allocbt blocks because these blocks are tracked as free
+	 * space but not available for allocation. Technically this means that a
+	 * single reservation cannot consume all remaining free space, but the
+	 * ratio of allocbt blocks to usable free blocks should be rather small.
+	 * The tradeoff without this is that filesystems that maintain high
+	 * perag block reservations can over reserve physical block availability
+	 * and fail physical allocation, which leads to much more serious
+	 * problems (i.e. transaction abort, pagecache discards, etc.) than
+	 * slightly premature -ENOSPC.
+	 */
+	set_aside = mp->m_alloc_set_aside;
+	if (mp->m_has_agresv)
+		set_aside += atomic64_read(&mp->m_allocbt_blks);
+
 	percpu_counter_add_batch(&mp->m_fdblocks, delta, batch);
-	if (__percpu_counter_compare(&mp->m_fdblocks, mp->m_alloc_set_aside,
+	if (__percpu_counter_compare(&mp->m_fdblocks, set_aside,
 				     XFS_FDBLOCKS_BATCH) >= 0) {
 		/* we had space! */
 		return 0;
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h
index 489d9b2c53d9..041f437dc117 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h
@@ -171,6 +171,12 @@ typedef struct xfs_mount {
 	 * extents or anything related to the rt device.
 	 */
 	struct percpu_counter	m_delalloc_blks;
+	/*
+	 * Global count of allocation btree blocks in use across all AGs. Only
+	 * used when perag reservation is enabled. Helps prevent block
+	 * reservation from attempting to reserve allocation btree blocks.
+	 */
+	atomic64_t		m_allocbt_blks;
 
 	struct radix_tree_root	m_perag_tree;	/* per-ag accounting info */
 	spinlock_t		m_perag_lock;	/* lock for m_perag_tree */
-- 
2.26.2
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help