Thread (4 messages) 4 messages, 2 authors, 2021-03-26

Re: [PATCH] xfsdocs: Small fix to correct first free inode to be 5847 not 5856.

From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-03-26 02:42:58

On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 09:14:16AM +0100, lukas@herbolt.com wrote:
From: Lukas Herbolt <redacted>

Thanks for confirmation, I was not sure about it.

Signed-off-by: Lukas Herbolt <redacted>
I'll massage the commit message a bit, but otherwise this looks fine.
Thank you for the correction!

Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>

--D
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
---
 design/XFS_Filesystem_Structure/allocation_groups.asciidoc | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/design/XFS_Filesystem_Structure/allocation_groups.asciidoc b/design/XFS_Filesystem_Structure/allocation_groups.asciidoc
index 992615d..cdc8545 100644
--- a/design/XFS_Filesystem_Structure/allocation_groups.asciidoc
+++ b/design/XFS_Filesystem_Structure/allocation_groups.asciidoc
@@ -1099,7 +1099,7 @@ recs[1-85] = [startino,freecount,free]
 Most of the inode chunks on this filesystem are totally full, since the +free+
 value is zero.  This means that we ought to expect inode 160 to be linked
 somewhere in the directory structure.  However, notice that 0xff80000000000000
-in record 85 -- this means that we would expect inode 5856 to be free.  Moving
+in record 85 -- this means that we would expect inode 5847 to be free.  Moving
 on to the free inode B+tree, we see that this is indeed the case:
 
 ----
-- 
2.26.2
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help