Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfs: type verification is expensive
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Date: 2021-02-25 09:10:04
Any reason to not just mark them static inline and move them to xfs_types.h?
- [PATCH 0/3] xfs: 64kb directory block verification hurts · Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> · 2021-02-23
- [PATCH 1/3] xfs: type verification is expensive · Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> · 2021-02-23
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfs: type verification is expensive · "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org> · 2021-02-24
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfs: type verification is expensive · Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> · 2021-02-25
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfs: type verification is expensive · Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> · 2021-02-25
- [PATCH 2/3] xfs: No need for inode number error injection in __xfs_dir3_data_check · Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> · 2021-02-23
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] xfs: No need for inode number error injection in __xfs_dir3_data_check · "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org> · 2021-02-24
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] xfs: No need for inode number error injection in __xfs_dir3_data_check · Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> · 2021-02-25
- [PATCH 3/3] xfs: reduce debug overhead of dir leaf/node checks · Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> · 2021-02-23
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] xfs: reduce debug overhead of dir leaf/node checks · "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org> · 2021-02-24
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] xfs: reduce debug overhead of dir leaf/node checks · Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> · 2021-02-25