Re: [PATCH] xfs: restore speculative_cow_prealloc_lifetime sysctl
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-02-12 21:29:03
On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 08:21:47AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 09:24:36AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:quoted
From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> In commit 9669f51de5c0 I tried to get rid of the undocumented cow gc lifetime knob. The knob's function was never documented and it now doesn't really have a function since eof and cow gc have been consolidated. Regrettably, xfs/231 relies on it and regresses on for-next. I did not succeed at getting far enough through fstests patch review for the fixup to land in time. Restore the sysctl knob, document what it did (does?), put it on the deprecation schedule, and rip out a redundant function. Fixes: 9669f51de5c0 ("xfs: consolidate the eofblocks and cowblocks workers") Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>Thnanks for doing this, Darrick!quoted
STATIC int -xfs_deprecate_irix_sgid_inherit_proc_handler( +xfs_deprecated_dointvec_minmax( struct ctl_table *ctl, int write, void *buffer,@@ -60,23 +60,7 @@ xfs_deprecate_irix_sgid_inherit_proc_handler( { if (write) { printk_once(KERN_WARNING - "XFS: " "%s sysctl option is deprecated.\n", - ctl->procname); - } - return proc_dointvec_minmax(ctl, write, buffer, lenp, ppos); -} - -STATIC int -xfs_deprecate_irix_symlink_mode_proc_handler( - struct ctl_table *ctl, - int write, - void *buffer, - size_t *lenp, - loff_t *ppos) -{ - if (write) { - printk_once(KERN_WARNING - "XFS: " "%s sysctl option is deprecated.\n", + "XFS: %s sysctl option is deprecated.\n", ctl->procname); }The use of printk_once means it will only warn on the first deprecated sysctl written to, not the first write to each of the deprecated sysctls. Is there any evidence that anyone is writing these with any regualr frequency, and if not, maybe just a ratelimited warning is sufficient here?
I've never seen any evidence that people hammer on sysctls with great frequency. Will change to printk_ratelimited. --D
Otherwise looks fine. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com