Re: generic/232 test failures on 4.14-rc1
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Date: 2017-09-27 09:42:06
Also in:
linux-ext4
Hi Darrick! On Tue 26-09-17 18:19:29, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 02:58:31PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:quoted
On Mon 25-09-17 15:59:46, Jan Kara wrote:quoted
On Thu 21-09-17 11:48:46, Eric Whitney wrote:quoted
I'm seeing generic/232 fail from time to time when running a 4.14-rc1 kernel on xfstest-bld's most recent kvm-xfstests test appliance. In one set of trials, it failed in the same manner 4 out of 10 times when running the 4k test configuration for ext4. The failure bisects to "quota: Do not acquire dqio_sem for dquot overwrites in v2 format" (ab2b86360f6e). When this patch was reverted in a 4.14-rc1 kernel, the failure did not reoccur in a series of 20 trials.Thanks for debugging this! I'd just note that the commit hash of that change is different for me - d2faa415166b2883428efa92f451774ef44373ac.quoted
Example output from the failed test: QA output created by 232 Testing fsstress seed = S Comparing user usage 218a219quoted
#3740 -- 4 0 0 1 0 0245a247quoted
#45 -- 0 0 0 1 0 0Note: I'm also seeing a similar failure for generic/233, but the patch containing the root cause likely comes somewhere after ab2b86360f6e. I'll post another bug report once I locate it.I'll try to debug this further. Thanks for report!Attached patch fixes the problem for me. I'll merge it through my tree.Ever since 4.14-rc1, I've noticed the same problem (intermittent failures of generic/{232,233,270}) that Eric Whitney was complaining about when running xfstests against XFS. I'll try a proper bisect tomorrow, but given the big locking rework I wonder if that rings any bells for you?
Hum, no idea. XFS uses its own thing for quotas so my changes don't influence it at all. I don't know much about XFS internal quota implementation so I don't have a good guess what could have caused the breakage you see. I'm sorry. Honza -- Jan Kara [off-list ref] SUSE Labs, CR