Re: [RFC 00/12] xfs: more and better verifiers

[RFC 00/12] xfs: more and better verifiers · Darrick J. Wong <hidden> · 2017-08-17
[PATCH 01/12] xfs: refactor long-format btree header verification routines · Darrick J. Wong <hidden> · 2017-08-17
[PATCH 02/12] xfs: remove XFS_WANT_CORRUPTED_RETURN from dir3 data verifiers · Darrick J. Wong <hidden> · 2017-08-17
[PATCH 03/12] xfs: have buffer verifier functions report failing address · Darrick J. Wong <hidden> · 2017-08-17
[PATCH v2 03/12] xfs: have buffer verifier functions report failing address · Darrick J. Wong <hidden> · 2017-08-19
[PATCH 04/12] xfs: refactor verifier callers to print address of failing check · Darrick J. Wong <hidden> · 2017-08-17
[PATCH 05/12] xfs: verify dinode header first · Darrick J. Wong <hidden> · 2017-08-17
[PATCH 06/12] xfs: move inode fork verifiers to xfs_dinode_verify · Darrick J. Wong <hidden> · 2017-08-17
[PATCH 07/12] xfs: create structure verifier function for shortform xattrs · Darrick J. Wong <hidden> · 2017-08-17
[PATCH 08/12] xfs: create structure verifier function for short form symlinks · Darrick J. Wong <hidden> · 2017-08-17
[PATCH 09/12] xfs: refactor short form directory structure verifier function · Darrick J. Wong <hidden> · 2017-08-17
[PATCH 10/12] xfs: provide a centralized method for verifying inline fork data · Darrick J. Wong <hidden> · 2017-08-17
[PATCH 11/12] xfs: fail out of xfs_attr3_leaf_lookup_int if it looks corrupt · Darrick J. Wong <hidden> · 2017-08-17
[PATCH 12/12] xfs: create a new buf_ops pointer to verify structure metadata · Darrick J. Wong <hidden> · 2017-08-17
Re: [RFC 00/12] xfs: more and better verifiers · Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> · 2017-08-18
Re: [RFC 00/12] xfs: more and better verifiers · Darrick J. Wong <hidden> · 2017-08-18
Re: [RFC 00/12] xfs: more and better verifiers · Darrick J. Wong <hidden> · 2017-08-18
Re: [RFC 00/12] xfs: more and better verifiers · Darrick J. Wong <hidden> · 2017-08-18
Re: [RFC 00/12] xfs: more and better verifiers · Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> · 2017-08-19
Re: [RFC 00/12] xfs: more and better verifiers · Darrick J. Wong <hidden> · 2017-08-19
Re: [RFC 00/12] xfs: more and better verifiers · Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> · 2017-08-19
Re: [RFC 00/12] xfs: more and better verifiers · Darrick J. Wong <hidden> · 2017-08-19
Re: [RFC 00/12] xfs: more and better verifiers · Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> · 2017-08-19
Re: [RFC 00/12] xfs: more and better verifiers · Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> · 2017-08-21
Re: [RFC 00/12] xfs: more and better verifiers · Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> · 2017-08-29
Re: [RFC 00/12] xfs: more and better verifiers · Darrick J. Wong <hidden> · 2017-08-29
Re: [RFC 00/12] xfs: more and better verifiers · Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> · 2017-08-29
Re: [RFC 00/12] xfs: more and better verifiers · Darrick J. Wong <hidden> · 2017-08-31
Re: [RFC 00/12] xfs: more and better verifiers · Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> · 2017-08-31
Re: [RFC 00/12] xfs: more and better verifiers · Eric Sandeen <hidden> · 2017-08-31
Re: [RFC 00/12] xfs: more and better verifiers · Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> · 2017-08-31
Re: [RFC 00/12] xfs: more and better verifiers · Darrick J. Wong <hidden> · 2017-08-31
Re: [RFC 00/12] xfs: more and better verifiers · Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> · 2017-08-31
Re: [RFC 00/12] xfs: more and better verifiers · Darrick J. Wong <hidden> · 2017-08-31

From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Date: 2017-08-21 08:13:33

So what do you think of the version that adds real printks for
each condition including more details like the one verifier I
did below?  Probably needs some unlikely annotations, though.

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help