On 1/16/17 7:45 AM, Ralph Sennhauser wrote:

On Sun, 15 Jan 2017 14:32:00 -0600
Eric Sandeen [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On 9/10/16 2:37 AM, Ralph Sennhauser wrote:

quoted

---

Based on the earlier discussion this seems to be the preferred way
of handling things.

Should I split it into 3 patches?
Do you want something different to happen when cross-compiling?  

Hi Ralph -

I just merged a patch to for-next to address cross-compiling;
it was on the list prior to this one.

Can you confirm that it resolves your issues?

Hi Eric,

I compile tested 4.9.0 with 0a71e38396304b4d1215ba0b51cd6ce8e33eb40d on
top. Cross-compiling is fixed for me with this leaving only the d_namlen
issue with musl for which you already reviewed a patch from me. If that
gets addressed I can use vanilla xfsprogs.

Hi Ralph, that should have been merged as well.  Check out the for-next
branch of the git tree.

Thanks,
-Eric