Re: [PATCH] xfs: require 64-bit sector_t
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Date: 2014-06-18 15:21:40
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:14:31AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
Given that the existence of the string indicates large block/inode numbers, shouldn't we leave it to avoid any confusion? That aside, the rest of the patch looks fine to me.
As these have been enabled in any sane configuration I don't really see a point in printing these. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs