Re: [PATCH 1/6] xfstest: add fio git submodule
From: Dmitry Monakhov <hidden>
Date: 2012-09-24 12:41:42
Also in:
linux-ext4, linux-fsdevel
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 08:23:04 -0400, Greg Freemyer [off-list ref] wrote:
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 11:16 PM, Eric Sandeen [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
(I package fio for Fedora, is it not commonly available on other distros?)opensuse has it in the benchmarking repo, but not in the main release repos. If it is getting regular updates and users will want to have the latest version, it makes sense for opensuse to leave it that way. This discussion may change that. As of a year ago, xfstests dependencies could all be met from the main repos. (see howto http://en.opensuse.org/SDB:XFStests) I believe a basic set of xfstests is run as part of the QA process for every factory build (factory is similar to rawhide). At least it was during 12.1 pre-release testing a year ago. http://openqa.opensuse.org/results/ Not a huge deal, but having xfstests tests which depend on fio would either mean opensuse dropping those tests that depend on fio from its routine QA testing, or it would mean adding fio to the main distro. How far into xfstests is fio likely to integrate? If it is to become a core tool and it is not going to be provided by xfstests itself, I can try to submit fio to factory. It will just have to kept new enough to satisfy xfstests version requirements.
As far as i can say fio potentially can replace most of hardcoded regression binaries.
I do hope that if the distro has to provide a fio package, then xfstests only depend on the version, not the git check-in.
Greg -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
_______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs