Re: Anyone have test cases for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA?
From: Eric Sandeen <hidden>
Date: 2012-09-18 18:20:15
Also in:
linux-ext4, linux-fsdevel
On 9/18/12 1:15 PM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 09:43:36AM -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote:quoted
xfstest 285 and 286 (I believe these tests were only in the OSS version and not in the kernel.org developers version of xfstests).Hi Mark, Could you clarify what the relationship is between the OSS xfstests tree and the one on kernel.org? Is the OSS tree always ahead of the kernel.org tree (i.e., are the commits in the OSS tree a superset of the ones in the kernel.org tree)? I had been under the impression that commits flowed from the kernel.org tree to the OSS tree, but it sounds like I was misinformed on that point?
That was more or less correct at one point, but we recently decided to ditch the kernel.org repos and let sgi manage a single repo on oss.sgi.com going forward, just to simplify things. We just reached that agreement and haven't really communicated it yet I guess. So going forward, stick with the one on oss.sgi.com. Thanks, -Eric
Thanks, - Ted _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
_______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs