Thread (19 messages) 19 messages, 4 authors, 2012-02-11

Re: [PATCH 0/7] better dquot caching

From: Ben Myers <hidden>
Date: 2012-02-07 07:30:07

Hey Christoph,

On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 08:57:19AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
This series improves handling of large number of dquots.  It replaced
the direct recycling of dquots from the freelist with a shrinker, removes
the upper bound of dquots, and uses per-filesystem structures for all
quota state, including switching from a hash to a radix-tree for lookups.

For repeated lookups of dquots out of a large pool I see improvements
betwen 50% and 500% compared to the previous code.  All these tests
have been performed with Q_XQUOTASYNC already disabled as it would
change the result to much for both the old and new code.

Note that the first patch probably is a candidate for Linux 3.3, as
the previous quota updates caused a lock order reversal in the old
quota reclaim code.  See the actual patch for more details.
These conflict with Chandra's project quota patches.  I've started
looking at them again, but I am a little uncomfortable with the change
to the superblock...  could I get your opinion of that while I take a
look at these?

Thanks,
	Ben

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help