Thread (11 messages) 11 messages, 6 authors, 2012-01-29

Re: Insane file system overhead on large volume

From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Date: 2012-01-27 10:44:19

On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 08:50:38AM +0100, Manny wrote:
Hi there,

I'm not sure if this is intended behavior, but I was a bit stumped
when I formatted a 30TB volume (12x3TB minus 2x3TB for parity in RAID
6) with XFS and noticed that there were only 22 TB left. I just called
mkfs.xfs with default parameters - except for swith and sunit which
match the RAID setup.

Is it normal that I lost 8TB just for the file system? That's almost
30% of the volume. Should I set the block size higher? Or should I
increase the number of allocation groups? Would that make a
difference? Whats the preferred method for handling such large
volumes?
Where did you get the sizes for the raw volume and the filesystem usage
from?

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help