Re: [PATCH 6/9] xfstests: add a new test that runs fsstress under ENOSPC conditions
From: Dmitry Monakhov <hidden>
Date: 2011-11-07 13:31:16
Also in:
linux-fsdevel
On Mon, 7 Nov 2011 14:25:33 +0100, David Sterba [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Hi, I saw this while running the newly added tests on btrfs: On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 09:55:50PM +0400, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:quoted
--- /dev/null +++ b/269 +_workout() +{ + echo "" + echo "Run fsstress" + echo "" + num_iterations=10 + enospc_time=2 + out=$SCRATCH_MNT/fsstress.$$ + args="-p128 -n999999999 -f setattr=1 $FSSTRESS_AVOID -d $out" + echo "fsstress $args" >> $here/$seq.full + $FSSTRESS_PROG $args > /dev/null 2>&1 & + pid=$! + echo "Run dd writers in parallel" + for ((i=0; i < num_iterations; i++)) + do + # File will be opened with O_TRUNC each time + dd if=/dev/zero of=$SCRATCH_MNT/SPACE_CONSUMER bs=1M count=1 \ + > /dev/null 2>&1 + sleep $enospc_time + done + kill $pid269 [failed, exit status 1] - output mismatch (see 269.out.bad)--- 269.out 2011-11-07 13:26:23.000000000 +0100 +++ 269.out.bad 2011-11-07 14:07:44.000000000 +0100@@ -3,3 +3,4 @@ Run fsstress Run dd writers in parallel +./269: line 60: kill: (9754) - No such processquoted
+ wait $pid +}and the test is reported to fail. Seems that the dd commands finish in less 2 seconds.
Have you recompile fsstress via make? test explicitly want use new feature "-f setattr=1"
david -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
_______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs