Re: [PATCH 1/4] xfstests: fix fsx fpunch test to actually test for fpunch
From: Alex Elder <hidden>
Date: 2011-07-08 17:56:17
From: Alex Elder <hidden>
Date: 2011-07-08 17:56:17
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 10:53 +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
From: Dave Chinner <redacted> The operation flags parameter to fallocate is the second parameter, not the last. Hence the fpunch test is actually testing for falloc support, not fpunch. Somebody needs a brown paper bag. Also, add a ftruncate call whenthe fpunch succeeds just in case the file was not already zero sized. Failing to ensure we start with a zero length file can cause read ops to fail size checks if they occur before the file is written to be the main test loop. While there, observe the quiet flag the same as the falloc test does and have them both emit the warning at the same error level. Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <redacted>
Looks good. Even if the arguments were in the right order, the length has to be greater than zero also. Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <redacted> _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs