On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:01:24AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

The list field of it is never cactually used, so all uses can simply be
replaced with the xfs_dir2_sf_hdr_t type that it has as first member.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

I can't help but think this would have been a much smaller patch if
you rolled the contents of the xfs_dir2_sf_hdr_t into xfs_dir2_sf_t
and killed the xfs_dir2_sf_hdr_t instead. There's many more
occurrences of xfs_dir2_sf_t than there are xfs_dir2_sf_hdr_t.

Anyway, gotta run now so I'll look at this more later....

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs