Thread (45 messages) 45 messages, 9 authors, 2007-10-30

Re: [RFC] add FIEMAP ioctl to efficiently map file allocation

From: Anton Altaparmakov <hidden>
Date: 2007-05-02 08:31:33
Also in: linux-ext4, linux-fsdevel

On 2 May 2007, at 09:23, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
On 1 May 2007, at 23:30, Andreas Dilger wrote:
quoted
On May 01, 2007  14:22 +1000, David Chinner wrote:
quoted
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 04:44:01PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
quoted
Hmm, I'd thought "offline" would migrate to EXTENT_UNKNOWN, but  
I didn't
I disagree - why would you want to indicate the state is unknown  
when we know
very well that it is offline?
If you don't like "UNKNOWN", what about "UNMAPPED"?  I just want a
catch-all flag that indicates "this extent contains data but there is
nothing sensible to be returned for the extent mapping."
I like UNMAPPED.  I even use it in NTFS internally for extents maps  
that have not been read into memory yet.  (-:
Oops, I use NOT_MAPPED in NTFS rather than UNMAPPED but I still like  
UNMAPPED, too.  (-:

Best regards,

	Anton
-- 
Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cam.ac.uk> (replace at with @)
Unix Support, Computing Service, University of Cambridge, CB2 3QH, UK
Linux NTFS maintainer, http://www.linux-ntfs.org/
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help