Re: [PATCH 1 of 2] Implement generic block_page_mkwrite() functionality
From: David Chinner <hidden>
Date: 2007-02-08 22:31:22
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, linux-mm
From: David Chinner <hidden>
Date: 2007-02-08 22:31:22
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, linux-mm
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 08:11:00AM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 09:50:13AM +1100, David Chinner wrote:quoted
quoted
You don't need to lock out all truncation, but you do need to lock out truncation of the page in question. Instead of your i_size checks, check page->mapping isn't NULL after the lock_page?Yes, that can be done, but we still need to know if part of the page is beyond EOF for when we call block_commit_write() and mark buffers dirty. Hence we need to check the inode size. I guess if we block the truncate with the page lock, then the inode size is not going to change until we unlock the page. If the inode size has already been changed but the page not yet removed from the mapping we'll be beyond EOF. So it seems to me that we can get away with not using the i_mutex in the generic code here.vmtruncate changes the inode size before waiting on any pages. So, i_size could change any time during page_mkwrite.
Which would put us beyond EOF. Ok.
It would be a good idea to read i_size once and put it in a local var instead.
Will do - I'll snap it once the page is locked.... Thanks Chris. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group