RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v2 40/43] wifi: nxpwifi: add wmm.h

Hi Greg,

	Following the guideline for new driver, it should let every file as a single patch for review and generate a final
	single patch after reviewing. I think stuffs mentioned by you can be got from cover letter.

	If I misunderstood anything, please let me know.

Thanks,
David

-----Original Message-----
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2024 2:48 AM
To: David Lin <redacted>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
kvalo@kernel.org; johannes@sipsolutions.net; briannorris@chromium.org;
francesco@dolcini.it; Pete Hsieh [off-list ref]
Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v2 40/43] wifi: nxpwifi: add wmm.h

Caution: This is an external email. Please take care when clicking links or
opening attachments. When in doubt, report the message using the 'Report
this email' button


On Fri, Aug 09, 2024 at 05:45:30PM +0800, David Lin wrote:

quoted

---
 drivers/net/wireless/nxp/nxpwifi/wmm.h | 78
++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/net/wireless/nxp/nxpwifi/wmm.h

Hi,

This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.  You have sent him a
patch that has triggered this response.  He used to manually respond to these
common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept writing the same
thing over and over, yet to different people), I was created.  Hopefully you will
not take offence and will fix the problem in your patch and resubmit it so that
it can be accepted into the Linux kernel tree.

You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s) as
indicated below:

- Your patch does not have a Signed-off-by: line.  Please read the
  kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst and resend
  it after adding that line.  Note, the line needs to be in the body of
  the email, before the patch, not at the bottom of the patch or in the
  email signature.

- You did not specify a description of why the patch is needed, or
  possibly, any description at all, in the email body.  Please read the
  section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file,
  Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what is needed in
  order to properly describe the change.

- You did not write a descriptive Subject: for the patch, allowing Greg,
  and everyone else, to know what this patch is all about.  Please read
  the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file,
  Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what a proper
  Subject: line should look like.

If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about how to
resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and Greg will reply
once he has dug out from the pending patches received from other developers.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot