On Wednesday 12 January 2022 11:58:59 CET Pali Rohár wrote:
On Tuesday 11 January 2022 18:14:08 Jerome Pouiller wrote:
quoted
+static const struct sdio_device_id wfx_sdio_ids[] = {
+ { SDIO_DEVICE(SDIO_VENDOR_ID_SILABS, SDIO_DEVICE_ID_SILABS_WF200) },
+ { },
+};
Hello! Is this table still required?
As far as I understand, if the driver does not provide an id_table, the
probe function won't be never called (see sdio_match_device()).
Since, we rely on the device tree, we could replace SDIO_VENDOR_ID_SILABS
and SDIO_DEVICE_ID_SILABS_WF200 by SDIO_ANY_ID. However, it does not hurt
to add an extra filter here.
quoted
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(sdio, wfx_sdio_ids);
+
+struct sdio_driver wfx_sdio_driver = {
+ .name = "wfx-sdio",
+ .id_table = wfx_sdio_ids,
+ .probe = wfx_sdio_probe,
+ .remove = wfx_sdio_remove,
+ .drv = {
+ .owner = THIS_MODULE,
+ .of_match_table = wfx_sdio_of_match,
+ }
+};
--
2.34.1
--
Jérôme Pouiller