Thread (42 messages) flat view 42 messages, 5 authors, 2022-02-10

Re: [PATCH v9 08/24] wfx: add bus_sdio.c

From: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com>
Date: 2022-01-12 11:19:15
Also in: linux-devicetree, linux-mmc, lkml, netdev

On Wednesday 12 January 2022 11:58:59 CET Pali Rohár wrote:
On Tuesday 11 January 2022 18:14:08 Jerome Pouiller wrote:
quoted
+static const struct sdio_device_id wfx_sdio_ids[] = {
+     { SDIO_DEVICE(SDIO_VENDOR_ID_SILABS, SDIO_DEVICE_ID_SILABS_WF200) },
+     { },
+};
Hello! Is this table still required?
As far as I understand, if the driver does not provide an id_table, the
probe function won't be never called (see sdio_match_device()).

Since, we rely on the device tree, we could replace SDIO_VENDOR_ID_SILABS
and SDIO_DEVICE_ID_SILABS_WF200 by SDIO_ANY_ID. However, it does not hurt
to add an extra filter here.
quoted
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(sdio, wfx_sdio_ids);
+
+struct sdio_driver wfx_sdio_driver = {
+     .name = "wfx-sdio",
+     .id_table = wfx_sdio_ids,
+     .probe = wfx_sdio_probe,
+     .remove = wfx_sdio_remove,
+     .drv = {
+             .owner = THIS_MODULE,
+             .of_match_table = wfx_sdio_of_match,
+     }
+};
--
2.34.1

-- 
Jérôme Pouiller


Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help