Thread (13 messages) 13 messages, 3 authors, 2021-12-08

Re: [PATCH 3/3] ath11k: process full monitor mode rx support

From: Anilkumar Kolli <hidden>
Date: 2021-12-08 13:13:26
Also in: ath11k

On 2021-11-12 13:22, Kalle Valo wrote:
Jouni Malinen [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
From: Anilkumar Kolli <redacted>

In full monitor mode, monitor destination ring is read before monitor
status ring. mon_dst_ring has ppdu id, reap till the end of PPDU. Add
all the MPDUs to list. Start processing the status ring, if PPDU id in
status ring is lagging behind, reap the status ring, once the PPDU ID
matches, deliver the MSDU to upper layer. If status PPDU id leading,
reap the mon_dst_ring. The advantage with full monitor mode is 
hardware
has status buffers available for all the MPDUs in mon_dst_ring.

Tested-on: QCN9074 hw1.0 PCI 
WLAN.HK.2.4.0.1-01734-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1

Signed-off-by: Anilkumar Kolli <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <redacted>
I changed the commit log to this to better describe how this patch 
helps:

    ath11k: process full monitor mode rx support

    In full monitor mode, monitor destination ring is read before 
monitor
    status ring. mon_dst_ring has ppdu id, reap till the end of PPDU. 
Add
    all the MPDUs to list. Start processing the status ring, if PPDU id 
in
    status ring is lagging behind, reap the status ring, once the PPDU 
ID
    matches, deliver the MSDU to upper layer. If status PPDU id 
leading,
    reap the mon_dst_ring.

    The advantage with full monitor mode is hardware has status
buffers available
    for all the MPDUs in mon_dst_ring, which makes it possible to 
deliver more
    frames to be seen on sniffer.

    Tested-on: QCN9074 hw1.0 PCI 
WLAN.HK.2.4.0.1-01734-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1

But now I see a new warning with QCA6390 caused by patch 3. Please fix
that and submit v2.

[  108.354361] ath11k_pci 0000:06:00.0: chip_id 0x0 chip_family 0xb
board_id 0xff soc_id 0xffffffff
[  108.354547] ath11k_pci 0000:06:00.0: fw_version 0x101c06cc
fw_build_timestamp 2020-06-24 19:50 fw_build_id
[  110.995359] INFO: trying to register non-static key.
[  110.995429] The code is fine but needs lockdep annotation, or maybe
[  110.995489] you didn't initialize this object before use?
[  110.995546] turning off the locking correctness validator.
[  110.995604] CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Kdump: loaded Tainted: G
      W         5.15.0-wt-ath+ #522
[  110.995664] Hardware name: Intel(R) Client Systems
NUC8i7HVK/NUC8i7HVB, BIOS HNKBLi70.86A.0067.2021.0528.1339 05/28/2021
[  110.995720] Call Trace:
[  110.995774]  <IRQ>
[  110.995828]  dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x7d
[  110.995887]  register_lock_class+0x1604/0x17e0
[  110.995945]  ? check_prev_add+0x7bb/0x20f0
[  110.996002]  ? is_dynamic_key+0x1a0/0x1a0
[  110.996058]  ? validate_chain+0xac3/0x1b30
[  110.996127]  __lock_acquire+0x96/0x1870
[  110.996196]  ? check_prev_add+0x20f0/0x20f0
[  110.996266]  ? sched_clock_cpu+0x15/0x1b0
[  110.996339]  ? mark_lock+0xd0/0x14a0
[  110.996401]  lock_acquire.part.0+0x117/0x340
[  110.996470]  ? ath11k_dp_rx_mon_dest_process.constprop.0+0x13a/0x6e0 
[ath11k]
[  110.996553]  ? rcu_read_unlock+0x40/0x40
[  110.996622]  ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x3a/0x70
[  110.996685]  ? lock_acquire+0x1a8/0x210
[  110.996751]  ? ath11k_dp_rx_mon_dest_process.constprop.0+0x13a/0x6e0 
[ath11k]
[  110.996831]  _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x34/0x80
[  110.996892]  ? ath11k_dp_rx_mon_dest_process.constprop.0+0x13a/0x6e0 
[ath11k]
[  110.996971]  ath11k_dp_rx_mon_dest_process.constprop.0+0x13a/0x6e0 
[ath11k]
[  110.997071]  ? ath11k_dp_rxbufs_replenish+0x7a0/0x7a0 [ath11k]
[  110.997187]  ? mark_held_locks+0xa5/0xe0
[  110.997272]  ? ath11k_hal_rx_parse_mon_status_tlv+0x6d7/0x1880 
[ath11k]
[  110.997389]  ? ath11k_hal_rx_parse_mon_status+0xed/0x170 [ath11k]
[  110.997506]  ath11k_dp_rx_process_mon_rings+0x3f9/0x580 [ath11k]
[  110.997600]  ? ath11k_dp_rx_pdev_alloc+0xd50/0xd50 [ath11k]
[  110.997680]  ath11k_dp_service_mon_ring+0x67/0xe0 [ath11k]
[  110.997759]  ? ath11k_dp_rx_process_mon_rings+0x580/0x580 [ath11k]
[  110.997835]  call_timer_fn+0x167/0x4a0
[  110.997903]  ? add_timer_on+0x3b0/0x3b0
[  110.997967]  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare.part.0+0x18c/0x370
[  110.998031]  __run_timers.part.0+0x539/0x8b0
[  110.998123]  ? ath11k_dp_rx_process_mon_rings+0x580/0x580 [ath11k]
[  110.998228]  ? call_timer_fn+0x4a0/0x4a0
[  110.998314]  ? clockevents_program_event+0xdd/0x280
[  110.998408]  ? recalibrate_cpu_khz+0x10/0x10
[  110.998496]  ? ktime_get+0x119/0x2f0
[  110.998579]  ? hrtimer_interrupt+0x32f/0x770
[  110.998679]  run_timer_softirq+0x97/0x180
[  110.998764]  __do_softirq+0x276/0x86a
[  110.998850]  __irq_exit_rcu+0x11c/0x180
[  110.998934]  irq_exit_rcu+0x5/0x20
[  110.999017]  sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x8e/0xc0
[  110.999100]  </IRQ>
[  110.999181]  <TASK>
[  110.999261]  asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x12/0x20
I have posted v2 patch. With v2, I did not see the issue with QCA6390 
during the bootup.

Thanks
Anil
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help