On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 03:30:24PM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 07:46:04PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
quoted
quoted
o By default we now always skip built-in firmware even if a FW_LOADER=y
I do not understand, why would we ever want to skip built-in firmware?
Because it is done this way today only implicitly because
EXTRA_FIRMWARE is empty. Using a kconfig entry makes this
more obvious.
Greg,
The fact that it was not obvious to you we were effectively disabling
the built-in firmware functionality by default using side kconfig
symbols is a good reason to clarify this situation with its own kconfig
symbol.
And consider what I started below as well.
Please let me know why on the other hand we should *not* add this new
kconfig symbol?
quoted
quoted
o This also lets us make it clear that the EXTRA_FIRMWARE_DIR
kconfig entry is only used for built-in firmware
How was it ever used for anything else? :)
Well later this patch set also renames this to something more
sensible, and so that change is clearer through this patch.
quoted
I can not take this as-is, so yes :)
Well please let me know again once you read the above explanations.
I think the new kconfig is very well justified given the above.
Luis