Thread (22 messages) flat view 22 messages, 5 authors, 2021-10-18

Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] nl80211: vendor-cmd: add Intel vendor commands for iwlmei usage

From: Kalle Valo <hidden>
Date: 2021-10-18 11:26:35

"Grumbach, Emmanuel" [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
quoted
On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 8:09 PM Kalle Valo [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Emmanuel Grumbach [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
iwlmei allows to integrate with the CSME firmware. There are flows
that are prioprietary for this purpose:

* Get the information the AP, the CSME firmware is connected
  to. This is useful when we need to speed up the connection
  process in case the CSME firmware has an TCP connection
  that must be kept alive across the ownership transition.
* Forbid roaming, which will happen when the CSME firmware
  wants to tell the user space not disrupt the connection.
* Request ownership, upon driver boot when the CSME firmware
  owns the device.
Vendor command requirements are documented here:

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/nl80211#
vendor-specific_api

The commit log is not really answering to those. For example, how a
user would use this? Or is there a user space tool?
We intend to send those command from the NetworkManager.
I'm not really fond of the idea that NetworkManager uses nl80211 vendor
commands, sounds quite hacky to me. I would prefer that NetworkManager
uses generic nl80211 interface so that it works with every driver. But I need
to look at v4 to understand more how this all works.
You'd need to look at v5 which I already sent.
Nothing of this can be generic, because it is really Intel
proprietary.
Every company always says that their implemention is proprietary :) So
that's not really a technical reason....
CSME can only use Intel devices by design. It uses a proprietary bus
implemented only in Intel devices (and not even all of them, only the
ones in systems with the vPRO sticker).
Ok, fair enough. I guess this is exotic enough that no other driver ever
wants to implement, and I haven't seen any complaints either about this
vendor interface. But please do include the justification for the vendor
interface in the commit log as well.

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help